Flaws in Human Nature

untitled14I have to confess. I was born without the capacity to indulge in euphemisms. From birth, I have never been able to take comfort in something that is untrue and certainly could not believe something was true when it wasn’t. As a small child there was not even one second when I believed in Santa Clause. In elementary school, I remember having an epiphany that teachers were as likely to lie as were the children.

How is that for a gift? Actually it has been a burden and a source of anguish my entire life. Only in the past several years has this oddity worked to my advantage in any way. When the whole world relies on euphemisms for happiness, a person whose mind automatically rejects euphemisms deals with a lot of unpleasant stresses. Most social interaction is centered around euphemistic notions and those who won’t or can’t indulge get cut out of the heard. Life provides many opportunities to be a misfit. The no euphemisms syndrome is only one of them.` I am 65 now and am finally glad to be this way but it hasn’t been a piece of cake.

Nothing I write here has anything to do with intelligence. Anyone who can look out a window and observe has the capacity to explain things exactly the way I do. The difficulty for most is not being able to think without euphemisms. When everything in life is explained by comforting unsubstantiated thoughts and ideas, common sense provides no benefit. Discard the euphemisms and the truth becomes obvious. It may be unpleasant but it is the truth and will lead to right answers. Jesus said, “You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.” He never said the truth would make you happy or that life would get easier upon its knowing. He explained to his disciples that their lives would be difficult and that they would suffer for the sake of righteousness.

Today’s Christians need not worry about suffering for the sake of righteousness. Usually the staunchest believers have never read the New Testament. Churches to do not look like anything that has roots in the activities of Jesus and his Disciples.

Which would be a flaw? Would it be being euphemism impaired like I am or would it be a flaw to compulsively indulge in euphemisms? In the secular world, which is what economics studies, the indulge in euphemisms crowd is better off in terms of comfort. At this particular time in history, the euphemisms free set has the best chance of surviving.

The depression is coming and it will be accompanied by disorder, civil unrest and chaos.

Just Another Day at the Whorehouse is a great Curbside Jimmy tune that has to do with the nature of life.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.