Killing Explained

140903124055-isis-killer-beheading-video-story-topWho would not be sickened by watching a beheading or someone being burned alive? There is no pleasant way to watch the business of killing in operation. I have not watched any of these videos and will not. There is no need. I know what killing is. I also know when it is the right thing to do.

There is not much chance of the U.S. ever convincing ISIS to put up there knives and gas cans. We can control what we do. At the rate ISIS is going there is not any chance they will ever catch up to the U,S. In numbers of people wrongly killed. They could never get into our league.

When the U.S. kills, the citizens over here don’t mind. Enemies reasoning is actually pretty good. Where are American’s vulnerable? Americans will go to endless ends to increase and protect their self esteem. Enemies know this but they wrongly assume ordinary Americans have control over government. This is an area where ISIS and ordinary Americans agree. Both believe American citizens are in charge of government. Both are wrong censorship and mind control are far more effective than any propaganda that was conducted int the old Soviet Union. Here Americans think they are free when they are not and they believe what comes out of Washington. Citizens are technically in charge but congress hordes information and media has the same incentive to control minds as does government.

How would Americans feel about drone strikes, air strikes and other if our military campaigns were immoral? Would troops be called heroes and patriots if they turned out to be fighting to advance the profitability of American corporations instead? In truth these are immoral campaigns and they have nothing to do with the safety of Americans.

Americans see beheadings and burnings but their eyes are protected from images children being blown into four or five pieces by U.S. bombs. Immoral beginnings produce negative outcomes. It is as simple as that. Nothing good comes out of immoral American military adventures.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.