Two Dumbest Political Strategies

shutterstock_33786634_1There are only three things citizens want from government.

1.) protection

2.) something for nothing

3,) to reap where one has not sewn

The proper role of government is to administer justice and this falls under protection. Government providing protection is taken for granted. Every now and then there is an initiative to bolster the military but not that often.

Virtually all who approach government seek something for nothing or want to reap where they haven’t sown. Special sales people, the best in the world are hired to seek something for nothing or to enable their clients to reap where they don’t sow.

So what are the dumb strategies? Certainly nothing the upper 1% is doing is dumb. We all know that getting something for nothing is not possible but it is possible to come real close. The upper 1% do come real close. Commandeering the Federal Reserve to run up stock prices at the expense of the rest of the country provides the rich with more income than the poor get from all of their programs put together.

The poor never ask for anything but they do get enough to keep them from rioting.

Rank and file party members are the ones with the dumb political strategies.

Everything the government does happens because of pressure from outside the formal political system. Both Republicans and Democrats hold onto the fantasies of getting something for nothing or reaping where they don’t sow. They expect to achieve these things by working within the system when they are completely powerless and have not representation in congress.

Both groups would be better off if they focused on stopping the rich from using government to exploit everyone else. It is in fact possible to come very close to getting something for nothing from government. It is also possible to make billions reaping where one doesn’t sow. But only the rich have the political power to control government from outside of the formal system.

 

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.