A Future Conversation

For the last several decades, international banks, Wall Street, old rich, new rich, almost all corporations, news media, government and politicians have had compatible goals and incentives. Cooperation between these groups has been unprecedented and seemingly permanent.

For the first time in many years, these elite players are agreeing with each other less than 100% of the time. A commodity as universal as oil cannot fall in price as fast as it has unless the price had previously been elevated artificially. The oil price would not be falling unless people who have been cooperating with one another are no longer cooperating.

For the longest time, economists have been dismissing worries that a high trade deficit is a problem. They explain that it all balances out in the capital account. Foreigners buy American financial assets, so what is the problem?

The problem is that humans are not completely honest but they are assumed to be in economics. Foreign governments have tried to gain advantage by driving down the value of their currencies to make their manufactured goods more attractive around the globe. In the meantime the U.S. has been heavily subsidizing Wall Street and using the Federal Reserve to drive asset prices high above their natural market values.

In a short time mainstream economists will start making the astounding observation that a high trade deficit can be a detriment to the economy. There is nothing in economic theory to explain the effects of government inspired economic scams. It takes common sense to notice those things.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.