Americans the Economy and Their Government

There is a huge difference between fantasy based economics which is taught at Harvard, Yale and all of the expensive universities around the world and the simple concepts I teach with the Quillian,  Fantasy Free Economics approach. Mainstream economics has the intelligence, fancy models and credentials. With that, you get nothing with any utility to society.  They are fascinating to listen to but never get any results. They never will because their assumptions are not based in reality.

Human behavior does not follow their models because human beings only infrequently experience original thought. The brain seeks not fairness or freedom. The brain is a survival seeking organ. Mainstream economics teaches that all humans are freedom seeking animals. In real life, freedom is bargained away for comfort and perceived certainty of survival that is offered by government, leaders, or crowd leaders of all kinds.  Work is a second choice. Mainstream economics treats work as a first choice. Thinking is work so humans are always looking for smarter folks to do their thinking for them. Nature provides only one basic incentive, self interest. The incentive to serve is assumed to be present in mainstream economics but that is only fantasy.

The fantasy free life reduces stress that would otherwise be unbearable.  Through fantasy, we can all pretend that the universe is less harsh than it is and be content and comfortable until we die. Assuming that there is nothing required of us here on earth and any afterlife is available to everyone and the goal is to be happy while we are here, this approach is the best one. Taking a harsh look at reality, in that case is not necessary except, perhaps once in a hundred years. We are at that point now and that is why I write this blog.

Americans today generally profess to be in favor of free market economics but make other choices every time an option is offered. Americans profess to be freedom seekers who are independent minded. There is an endless line in front of government, begging for benefits. As freedoms continue to diminish, Americans never raise an eyebrow. This is because human beings, are not what they think  and they are prone to engaging in master/servant relationships. People are managed by one another the same way a master manages a dog. The master offers a treat and the animal responds according the the master’s wishes. Humans will profess that this is untrue and that they are special noble creatures and at the very same time exhibit the behaviors I just described.

If you want to understand what is happening on the political and economic scene, keep all of this in mind. Do not expect your fellow man to jump at the opportunity to be more free and independent over the coming days with the change in government. Expect herd behavior. Given the opportunity to return to a free market economy, Americans will seek to serve instead. This is something they can’t help. As soon as new opportunities emerge, people look for a kind master more than opportunities to be free and independent. Free markets started emerging after the Dark Ages. Still, people are hardwired to serve masters and a kind master is always their preference.

A very small minority of citizens prefer freedom and independence. That portion of the population is going to experience great stress in the coming days. When the majority volunteers for slavery, free and independent folks get enslaved right along with them.

 The Grazin’ Is Good by Curbside Jimmy

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.