Anatomy of the Herd

Americans and people in general act on the basis that they think independently of one another. It sounds good and it is highly flattering to believe such a thing but the world would not be structured the way it is if people really thought independently.

The universe, at least the portion of it we occupy is governed by laws of dominance and subservience. Every life form that survives does so by dominating and making use of anything weaker. Strong members of a species find ways to be served by weaker members.

Human beings are natural herders of other animals. We organize other animals into herds so that we can eat them, milk them, sheer them, skin them and use them to satisfy any needs they might fulfill. Herding does not stop with other animals. Human beings also herd one another. The Old Testament is full of examples of one country conquering another with the result being weaker nations serving the strong ones. Humans use the same techniques of reward and punishment in herding one another as they use in herding animals of a different species.

The Declaration of Independence states that “All men are created equal.” Hopefully this was meant in terms of equal under the law or treated equally within the legal system. Most likely, we are all born with certain attributes so as to perform necessary tasks within the group. Those who become presidents, representatives and senators are born with political personalities which are largely the same as those of sociopaths. In order to take control of large groups of people, one must be completely ruthless. Something like a need to be honest would be a definite hindrance to anyone trying to be a king or a president. On the other hand the vast majority are preprogrammed to offer services to those in charge in return for comfort.

Who has independent thoughts? Perhaps as much as three percent actually speak words that are the result of original thoughts. Everyone else believes they are thinking but what passes as a thought is only a recording the mind has made. Almost all political discourse is of this nature, especially what is heard in conservative echo chambers.

With the advent of the Internet, is was initially thought the masses would be empowered. For a while it turned out that way but the end result is that technology facilitates herding efforts. The Internet makes it possible to manage the thoughts, opinions and behaviors of countless people. The most profitable businesses these days are corporations like Google and Facebook that build and manage herds of people.

American Citizens wrongly profess that they are in charge of government. The role of American Citizens is much like that of dairy cows. Like cows, citizens are made as comfortable as possible because that way they are of greater use to the people in charge. Programs for the poor are actually of greater benefit to the elitist who run government. As long as the poor are comfortable there is not much chance they will riot or cause problems in other ways.

In a democracy, there is great competition to determine who gets to milk the herd. The Republican National Convention and the Democratic National Convention are facilitators of the herding process. Any American who joins or supports a political party is actually unwittingly promoting his own poverty. Aggregations of people are managed in about the same way as aggregations of animals.

Every human being has the ability to think independently but the herd member role is the path of least resistance. In the coming times of stress, do not expect common people to take control of government. In all of history, that has never happened. When people are under stress they ask for more government even when government is the cause of the stress. It is human nature to treat government as if it had divine powers. This will be very unpleasant for the very small number who live and think outside of the herd.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.