Anti Moore Republicans

Government is not a truth seeking institution. Government is not a place where issues are decided on the basis of fairness.  Lawmakers primarily serve themselves and only pacify constituents.  Government is the place where folks with the most money and power go to impose their will on the public. Americans are at a great disadvantage because almost 100% believe representatives are working on their behalf.

Politics is the world’s most competitive activity. It is so competitive only citizens with highly unlikely personality characteristic  are able to win elections.  Of course ordinary citizens belief the leaders they support are “just like us.”

Senators and congressmen on both sides of the isle have ongoing agendas delivering results to powerful people who literally pay them for results. A candidate like Roy Moore will hinder their efforts. I know little about Roy Moore. Lawmakers in office know him far more better than I do. He is obviously someone who will make the job of delivering the results lobbyists require of his peers more difficult. That is why members of his own party are trying to get rid of him.

Make no mistake. Roy Moore is a sociopath just as are his detractors. Any person high up in government has likely done as many anti social things as Moore has done. Who knows what Roy Moore is guilty or not guilty of? That doesn’t matter. The people trying to get rid of him don’t care about morals. Anything that he did many years ago has been dug up for the express purpose of keeping him out of the Senate. Morality is a concept that is understood in Washington but it is not used. Someone else’s immorality is only used as a means to an end. Morality is not used as a normal part of the governing process.

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.