Anti Trump Protestors

indexdfI write constantly about the stupidity of American voters.  Stupidity is only maladaptive behavior. Ignorance is a completely different issue. Stupidity is hard to pinpoint because it has more to do with preferring fantasy over truth. Stupidity can be harmless for long periods of time.

Protestors are calling Trump a fascist. They could at least look the term up in the dictionary. They are afraid Trump will lead the country towards being a fascist state. Have none of them noticed that 100% of the bills congress votes on are designed to rig one market or another. It would be hard for the U.S. to become more of a fascist state than it already is. The biggest constant in a fascist economy is that corporations run the government for their own benefit.

Trump’s biggest detractors are the RNC and the Billionaires who have hijacked congress and give orders to the Federal Reserve and the president.

Protestors are trying to save democracy by attempting to prevent Trump from using its principles. Calling Trump a fascist only makes sense to the masses who don’t know what the word means. These things happen because we teach our kids an abridged version of history and then pass them when they fail to understand that.

About the wall, the ignorant don’t seem to understand that we actually have a law on the books with respect to immigration. I wonder what other laws we should simply not enforce?

Here is Curbside Jimmy’s Rattle Snake
Song.

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.