Baltimore Riots

20150427_balt5Let me remind folks to expect more riots. Why? Laws are not being enforced at the top, especially in the financial sector. In a fascist system criminals get a pass if it is perceived that prosecuting them would be bad for the economy. Elitists benefit by extracting wealth and income out of everyone else. They are arrogant enough to assume no one notices their dishonesty.

People actually do notice even if they can’t put a finger precisely on the problem. Intuitively they know something is wrong even if they don’t know exactly what it is.

As long as folks are comfortable, dishonesty at the top is someone else’s problem. I will guarantee that blacks in Baltimore have more problems than being unfairly targeted by the police. When people get uncomfortable, they are prone to striking at government, and rioting.

There will be more riots even if issues between blacks and police are resolved. Trickle down economics is a cute term but it doesn’t have any real meaning. Trickle down crime is a very real thing because regular people take their cues from the people at the top. Crime is contagious.

Right now we are seeing civil unrest on the part of the seriously economically disadvantaged. In a fascist system the first lives to be destroyed are the ones at the bottom rung of the economic ladder. In just a little time the system starts to destroy the rung one step higher. Suffering starts at the bottom and then moves higher and higher until the economy is destroyed.

The issues between blacks and police goes all the way back to the civil war. Why are they picking 2015 to riot? I have already given you the answer to that question.00_logo_1

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

One thought on “Baltimore Riots

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.