China’s Devaluation

0023ae6cf369120e66c70fRich Chinese and the American rich have a lot in common. Both dictate economic policy to their respective governments. Long before 2008, the Chinese have kept their exchange rate very low, artificially low. The United States has kept its asset prices artificially high. Both countries provide their wealthiest citizens with enormous subsidies. The Chinese pretend their exchange rate reflects reality and the United States pretends its asset prices are realistic. These practices create hardships for the poor and middle class in both countries. For the most part, the poor and middle class in both countries are unaware they are being screwed.

When the United States wants to subsidize its richest citizens by inflating the value of their assets, interest rates are dropped below the rate of inflation. Eyes are closed while securities laws are broken. The U.S. Dollar is a publicly traded currency, so its value is created in an open market. To lower the exchange rate with the Yuan, the Chinese must change the exchange rate abruptly without the guidance of an organized market.

The Chinese devaluation is no more corrupt than the United States’ artificially lowering interest rates. Both actions are the means to the same end, just in different countries.

Remember that governments are not capable of making economic decisions. They are constantly charged with the task, but they can’t do it. Governments make political decisions, so despite any theatrics to the contrary, all central economic planning helps folks with a lot of political power and hurts everyone else.

The economic dangers Americans face are the result of many decades of subsidizing the rich and keeping wages low. Because the free market has been abandoned, resources are so inefficiently allocated that a recovery before a crash is not possible. The hardships of Americans are created by own government and not the Chinese.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.