Common Sense is Not Automatic

Let me review some basics with respect to Common Sense Economics. First know that using common sense is not automatic. First one must learn to recognize and remove the euphemisms of life, which distort our thinking. Without this first step common sense hurts more than it helps. Wrongly define institutions people and activities and common sense generates wrong answers. So, as human beings, are we special? Not hardly, but we all unwittingly act on the basis that we are. Mankind is basically good? Mankind is defined as good, but a quick glance at history reveals that it just ain’t so. Bad? No, lets just go with neutral. People act according to the incentives in front of them. Incentive based behavior is modified by various constraints. Nothing more need be said. For the sake of comfort and happiness, after our thinking is over, we can return to the world of euphemisms. The next financial crisis is close at hand and it is going to take all the wits a person has just to survive. Most Americans will lose everything they have.
Knowing that the economy is going to collapse doesn’t take much intelligence. By using common sense, without the handicap of euphemistic definitions of people and everything else, all we have to do is understand that over the last three decades, free market attributes have been removed from the structure of the economy. The rate at which our free market economy has been dismantled over the past five years makes it highly like the collapse will come very soon.


Euphemism Mountain

****************************

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.