Conspiracies, Hillary Clinton, her Dishonest Supporters and Fools

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally to promote early voting ahead of Super Tuesday at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Sunday, Feb. 28, 2016 in Pine Bluff, Ark. (AP Photo/Gareth Patterson)

Over the years there have been a small number of conspiracy theories that have never panned out. Some conspiracy theories come and go.

Only a few of us experience unique individual thoughts. We make up about three percent of the population. We notice things. We read a lot and don’t necessarily accept all that we encounter at face value. We are the source of new ideas. This is an approach to life that non thinkers are unfamiliar with. We are what Hillary Clinton and her supporters deem conspiracy theorists.

Normal human behavior is to trade freedom for comfort and deflect any new idea which conflicts with a person’s comfort zone. Virtually everyone who extrapolates something that is less than obvious out of someone’s behavior or spoken words, is quickly described as a conspiracy theorist. For the stupid and ignorant any idea they haven’t already heard from an authority figure is going to be described as conspiracy theory. To the stupid and unaware, all there is is what they have already heard or seen. These are the rank and file Hillary supporters. I might add that they are extremely dishonest, not only with you but with themselves. Thinking is dangerous and it leads to change. Their response is to call anyone with an unsettling observation a conspiracy theorist. Doing this is a lot easier for a dishonest lazy person than to launch an investigation and come up with a solid counter argument.

Do not mince your words out of fear of being called a conspiracy theorist, kook or any other unfriendly term a stupid ignorant person decides to throw at you.

The level of unique independent thought is actually not constant. Without stress or meaningful suffering the mind has a way of turning to mush. When stupidity becomes normal, suffering is right around the corner. Suffering is difficult but it does activate the thinking process. Stupidity is in fact the normal state of mind in the United States. When the suffering starts, more thinking will be initiated. What are deemed conspiracy theories today will suddenly become amazing insight. Of course some suspicions will always turn out not to be supported by facts as they unfold. Those of us who think, know that in advance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.