Coronavirus and the Logic of Government Action

Governments around the world are quarantining citizens and for the most part citizens see themselves as being protected by their respective government.

Does this make sense? Sure, given a world population that has completely submitted to their respective  governments and who are routinely rejecting the democratic process.

We will see how effective governmental efforts will be in containing the spread of the virus. I am suspecting that in the end, all of the governmental efforts will make no difference at all. All of the resources expended for the purpose of defeating the disease will be likely be lost for good and the virus will spread regardless.

Natural law tells us that all who work for and manage governments are guided by self interest above all else. Governments will do what is good for governments. Politicians will do what is good for politicians. In the United States, far more effort is going into saving the stock market and all of the other assets of the world’s richest 100. Absolutely no news is devoted to simply advising citizens of the fact that a new virus is spreading so that they can make their own preparations. There are always deaths when a virus spreads.

The interests of any government are the government itself along with all branches and agencies, the most politically powerful and all of the politicians themselves. In the end, all citizens of the world will experience further losses of freedom. All economies will further distance themselves from free market influences. Populations will experience deaths from the virus regardless. The same number of deaths will likely occur regardless of whether governmental efforts to contain the spread of the disease are made or not.

Citizens everywhere will take losses in terms of lost freedom and will be put in positions where they will be homogenized more so than they already are. They will end up serving their governments to a greater degree than they currently are.

Losses would be less if government just advised their citizens of the coming threat and let them make their own preparations.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.
Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Fantasy Free Economics Recommends The following Blogs

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.