Disappearance of the Search Engine Concept

What do Google, Bing and Duckduck Go have in common? The human mind has defined these enterprises as search engines. Google was a search engine at one time and a good one. Yahoo at one time was a search engine. Today there are no search engines. There are no phone books. The search engine concept has morphed into systems of managing and directing internet traffic. The term search engine sticks but the search function is now missing.

What does a real search engine do? Type a term like auto repair and a zip code into Google or any of its competitors and look at the results. Will you see links to auto repair shop websites close to where you live? You will see a list of shopping services which may are may not list anything like what you are looking for. Out of twenty results you might find as many as three actual websites for actual local shops. There are many more and they all have web sites. Suppose you are a musician looking for ways to network with others like you. Type in songwriters and a zip code. They are out their but they are not going to show up on your search.

Don’t mistake this for a complaint or a call for government action. What I am doing is identifying a vulnerability present in established search companies and an opportunity for some smart person to exploit. Google is huge and profitable but it actually prevents users from finding what they are looking for. Google is all there is. Even its competitors try to be as much like Google as they possible to be. How do they compete with Google? They send out the message, “Hey look at me. I am better at being Google than Google is.” It is no surprise that none of them have made any progress in eating into Google’s search market. What Google does not do is deliver much utility at all to people who use it, based on it being all that there is. Google’s search algorithm has to be one of histories best profit generating systems. However, it doesn’t deliver actual search results.

Does the term search engine optimization (SEO) mean anything to you? It does if you have a web page and are trying to get better search engine placement for your site. Sometimes SEO efforts can pay off but it has to be in an area unlike a mainstream business. Businesses like work from home opportunities or for SEO counselors may get a return based on SEO efforts. A hairdresser, or local restaurant would get no results at all. It is part of the Google business plan to squelch private individual sites. Google really is no longer is a search engine and neither are any of its competitors.

So what is the answer? I am not looking for an answer. Why don’t we just call on government to make those bad boys behave? That is not a function government does although it is constantly asked to. What about antitrust action? Antitrust actions are politically inspired and just don’t deliver the kind of results folks expect.

Monopolies are actually self destructive. Even the ones which appear invincible eventually crumble. AT&T was once considered a permanent monopoly. Then one day cell phones came along. It was goodbye to that monopoly.

Someone could start a search engine. How large would it have to be? How big would it have to be to compete with Google? The only reason it would have to start out as a giant operation would be if the goal was to immediately take half of Google’s traffic. It would only have to be big enough to earn a profit. A genuine general purpose search engine is an opportunity. There simply are not any genuine search engines in operation to day. It is definitely an opportunity.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their world view. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

 

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Dandelion Salad Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

One thought on “Disappearance of the Search Engine Concept

  1. Talitha Snow

    Totally agree , Google used to be a very decent search engine . Currently its a piece of idiocracy style garbage. I do miss the efficiency of a actual functioning search engine , and more importantly time saved

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.