Dominance and Subservience Deniers

0000With just a quick glance at the world we live in, we can see that all life is governed by laws of dominance and subservience. Every living thing survives by consuming other living things. The species which consumes the most of all others seems to survive most efficiently. Animals also press lower animals into service. Humans organize other animals into herds and train others like dogs and horses to be helpers and tools. Herding does not stop with other animals. Humans herd one another so as to profit off of the efforts of others.  Up until a few hundred years ago no distinction was made between owning humans and lower animals. For most of history, slavery has been widespread and normal.

Life is brutal and nature is ruthless. Jesus offered a spiritual alternative that some have excepted. Others fantasize that human nature is different than it is. These are the dominance and subservience deniers. The world is hard to cope with so to make the stay more pleasant most redefine everything to reduce stress.

Government is treated as a benevolent institution but it is just the opposite. Government is the go to institution when the goal is to exploit others.  With problems, perceived and real, government is automatically seen as having solutions to all problems. Global warming is deemed by some to be a severe problem, Government is pointed to as the sure solution.

If global warming was turned over to the governments of the world, the world would end much quicker than if the perceived problem was allowed to continue.  Believing governments are benevolent does not make them so. Government is where  folks go to exploit problems for personal benefit. Government working on stopping global warming would come down to countless initiatives to profit from the problem. The problem will become more pronounced because the larger the problem, the larger the profit.

As of late, global warming alarmists have been calling their detractors science deniers. They say global warming is settled science. Anyone who reads knows that is untrue especially since there is no such thing as settled science.

The laws of dominance and subservience are what determine the outcome of political events. It is deniers of dominance and subservience who are pushing the global warming agenda.

 

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.