Economics by Force

Download PDF Version

In any economy, the population over all is best served with a free market system. However, any given individual in an economy is better off being personally exempt from the laws of the free market system while everyone else is subject to them. Suppose in the NBA a certain team had a few players who were exempt from the rules of the game. So these players were free to foul with impunity while everyone else got penalized. Rather than the referees telling them what to do, they told the referees what to do. That team would win every game it played in. The anointed basket players would be engaging in basketball by force. The success of the NBA depends on the game being fair so cheating is not allowed.

A a free market economy, as far as rules are concerned, works in the same way as a basketball league. Except that in a basketball league players are not allowed to break the rules. With respect to an economy, it is possible to break the rules. Countless dollars are spent lobbying all of government, just to get permission to break the rules and it works.

The most positive attribute of a free market system is the absence of force. Before the advent of free markets, force was the main system used for rationing goods and services. Wars were fought for this reason. Even after the free market concept evolved wars continued to be fought either for economic gain or to avoid loss. Free markets actually are the only reason peace has been experienced anywhere in the world.

So what is a trade war? A trade war is economics by force and one can escalate into a shooting war almost in a heartbeat. What is a government fiscal stimulus package? It is economics by force. The fiscal package rewards those who have successfully lobbied government to gain an advantage over all others who still must abide by the riggers of a free market system. Stimulus is only a word that is used to fool general population and it does with regularity. The gap between the rich and the poor has widened constantly since the late 1970s. Why would that be? The Full Employment Act of 1978, also known as the Humphrey-Hawkins act mandated central economic planning on the part of government. Since that act was passed, there has been constant use of stimulus packages and other government interventions. The result has been a lopsided income distribution and it is still getting worse.

On an international level all countries together would be better off with zero restrictions on legal goods and services going in and out of every country. Trade restrictions such as the ones the United States is now imposing serve the purpose of creating an advantage on the world market for U.S. goods and services. Such restrictions will help a handful of U.S. corporations but will hurt every individual person in the country. How can the United States raise tariffs without other countries retaliating? It can only keep the responses of other countries subdued. That is because the United States has such a powerful military and has demonstrated a willingness to use it. Don’t think other countries are statues. They are working in frenzies to catch up to the U.S. militarily.

Any country in the world with no trade restrictions at all has a huge competitive advantage over all countries with tariffs. Why doesn’t China announce zero tariffs on legal goods coming or going? China suffers from the same malady as the United States. They have protected industries also. What would happen if the United States dropped all trade restrictions? Living standards at the bottom of the food chain would begin improving immediately. Corporations which had been allowed to cheat would not do as well. Suppose the country as a whole re-adopted the free market system that has been replaced by top down socialism? The living standards of the bottom 90% would skyrocket? The need for welfare and other public assistance would almost disappear.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Dandelion Salad Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

 

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.