Even Cash May Not be Safe

This is a reminder. There is no good place to invest money. Cash is best but cash is not completely safe either. Stocks are a death trap. For the past four years corporations have bought their own shares as a way of reporting record earnings while business has worsened. Corporate buybacks also create giant paydays for insiders who get to exercise stock options at astronomical prices. The elderly and others who need an income from their savings have been herded into high risk situations in order to maintain their lifestyles. Privateer firms or “Friends of the Fed”, get advance information in return for constantly augmenting stock prices by running the stops placed by short sellers and using high frequency trading to sabotage the trades of all other investors.

For those who hold cash, the most positive outcome is a market crash that will create the buying opportunity of a lifetime. The problem with cash is that of actually getting possession of it. The banking system will probably fail. When desperation sets in, authorities may opt to force customers to take stock in a failed bank or brokerage. Buy-ins have been used when some foreign banks have failed. Still, cash is best. It isn’t completely safe. It is only assumed to be.

Americans see themselves as a free people but this is highly uncertain. Technically Americans have lots of rights and freedoms. However, since the beginning in 1776, citizens have not once reined in government or even exercised authority over government. Self government actually has not been tried.

Are Americans free? The only way to find out is for Americans to attempt to use the freedom they claim to have.

Common Sense Economics is 78% cash and 22% short stocks. For the first time in over 12 months short positions have been increased slightly.

Euphemism Mountain is a Curbside Jimmy Favorite. It is about life as Americans insist it is.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.