FANGs A Controlled Correction

The FANG style stocks are experiencing what up to this point is a controlled correction. As expected, anyone with a short position in Dow type stocks is getting the life squeezed out of them. This is a major task and it is likely to fail. There is not one of these stocks that would be where it is today without the massive benefits of virtually free borrowed money.  The bottom would fall from beneath each of these stocks were they not heavily purchased by the Swiss National bank and other central banks. Not an economy in the world can survive a loss of buying power by the world’s wealthiest citizens.

So what is the goal? Keep the decline in the FANGS under control and protect the averages in general from damage by running up other big capitalization stocks to make up the difference. In a real market, one average might be up while the other is down a hand full of times over the period of a decade. In a rigged market, splitting the markets by ratcheting one average up while the others rest occurs on a daily basis.

How long will activity like this go on? It will not stop until and unless coercive action is taken to make it stop. Rigging financial markets is the one most profitable activities of the last 100 years. It may be the most profitable ever.

Human herding has always had a presence in the world. With the advent of the internet a number of years back, the practice of human herding has gone parabolic. Currently, human herding is second in profitability only to the purposeful manipulation of stocks. The herd-ability of humans is what provides profit for the FANGs. The herd-ability of the human species is less than constant. The mind actually does have a defense against over-herding just like the body builds up tolerance to foreign substances. Herd people enough and they start rejecting the control efforts. It takes time, but the success of herding activities of these organizations will moderate greatly over time. One truth that is recognized in advertising is that people develop a type of immunity to any approach or technique over time. It will work the same for corporations which make their profit herding people.

There are certain aspects to a rigged market which would never occur in a non tampered with system. You will notice the near impossibility of putting together a portfolio of profitable short positions. This is always difficult in a rising market but only in a completely rigged market is it an actual impossibility. Putting bear ETFs in a portfolio has the same issue. This is no accident. Profitable bearish positions can snowball and empower bearish money if equity builds up. Once control is lost, all else is lost as well.

One of the things you will notice about this rigged market situation is that the meaning traditional indicators is reversed. Back in the good ole’ days a broken trend line would say, “short this stock. It is a good risk.” With the system of rigged markets, such a broken trendline says, “there is going to be a short squeeze in FB. I think we will see a vicious short squeeze here in facebook. Lets see how it works out.
The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.