Fantasy Based Voting

8f687_121105093054-01-voting-1105-horizontal-galleryI am forever pointing out that Americans are ignorant but highly esteemed. Voting is not based on what ignorant people know. They don’t know anything. Voting is based on fantasy of knowing. Reading is almost never done. Scanning is done by voters who consider themselves informed. Rush Limbaugh constantly talks about “low information voters.” Rush is so ignorant it hurts to listen to him. Sean Hannity is much worse. The government they speak of doesn’t even exist. Donald Trump wants to make America great again.  I wonder what point in the past he would like to emulate? Donald Trump wants to make good free trade deals. Does he realize that as soon as a deal is made free trade is gone?

Show a voter a headline he agrees with and in his own mind he knows everything that is in it. I get mail from people all the time disputing a point that I made based on the interpretation of a headline. The point is not even in the article.

People vote their fantasies.  Getting a good president is a matter of luck because Americans don’t know a good candidate from a bad one. It is highly dangerous that they think they do.

In the future I am going to write more about natural incentives and what I call instinctive propensities. There may be a number of other natural incentives but self interest is the only one relevant outside of home and close relationships. Nature provides no incentive to serve although voters fantasies that there is.

There are other motivations which are not based on academic knowledge or even reasoning. These are the instinctive propensities. Instinctive propensities usually conflict with what someone understands intellectually. Human to human worship, leadership worship and patriotic behavior are three of the most common. Politicians intuitively understand instinctive propensities and use them to milk votes out of the population.

As I have stated over and over. In democracy crime and government merge. It has happened here. We know where Hillary is affiliated. Donald Trump seems to be still largely unaffiliated. If Trump wins, we will have perhaps six months when government is not completely controlled by organized crime. That will be an opportunity if perhaps 10% of the people grasp the problem and put up resistance.

I don’t know why Trump is running.  The incentive to serve is a non existent phenomenon present only in the imagination.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.