Fighting for Freedom?

aFighting to control the resources of Mideast countries is not fighting for freedom.  It is important for soldiers to know what they are fighting for. Documented deaths of civilians in Iraq alone are between 162,448 and 181,460.  Including military deaths are around 250,000. Ask a random Iraqi if he is glad the United States took over his country? The wars in Iraq never did have anything to do with freedom. Current operations in the Mideast have nothing to do with freedom. United States interference in Mideast affairs began in 1953 when we overthrew the only democratically elected  government Iran has ever had. In all the years since, there is not one additional free person in all of the Mideastern countries put together. U.S. and coalition casualties are under 10,000 for all Mideast wars combined.

I have a good friend who is a retired Air Force colonel. He is highly decorated and was frequently in harm’s way many times during his 26 years of service. When the decision was made to invade Iraq in 2003 he resigned because he would not invade and occupy a country that was no threat to the United States. Until this point he was planning to stay in the Air Force until they kicked him out for being too old. In my opinion This man is a good soldier.

Lets supposed the United States imposed our form of government in every country in the world. How would everything work out? Each country would have a government that was a democracy in name only, just like the one we have. Citizens in the United States have no representation at all in Congress. Elections are routinely rigged and public opinion is highly managed. Meaningful information is withheld from the public so that they will vote for the status quo and they do. They do not know any better. Should we not have a genuine democracy here before we intervene in the operation of governments elsewhere?

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.