Gun Violence and Mass Shootings

maxresdefaultAs usual you hear a lot of mush and nonsensical reasons from political candidates and the media. Come to Common Sense Economics and you get the real reason and the best course of action.

Gun violence, mass shootings and bizarre behavior are on the increase, right? Should we  be surprised? There is no direct connection but when there is obvious crime, graft and corruption coming from those who live above the law, it does not exactly go unnoticed. Enforcing laws that apply to those at the top will have a huge impact on the issue. When one law is ignored, respect is lost for laws in general.

The poor and the mentally ill know nothing about these things, you say. How could they be bothered by things they don’t know about? They don’t have to know. They can feel it.

Your government operates like an organized crime family. Yes, people do notice even if it is not on an intellectual basis. The ones already on the edge start flipping out first. Use government to administer justice and stop allowing government to be used to exploit the unaware. Fewer folks who are close to the edge will end up going over.

Liberals want stricter gun laws. Do you really trust government to decide who can own a gun? If you do you are crazy and doing more damage that if you were already documented to be mentally ill. Government does not function as a parent. You may be instinctively driven to treat government as a parent but it doesn’t work in that capacity. That is your fantasy.

Republicans, no conservatives have spoken up, naively believe they will hold on to their second amendment rights, when they never under any circumstances rein in government. People who are unwilling to control government have no business owning guns. I am not going to take your guns. You will lose them without me getting involved. The fact is, no one who is too irresponsible to rein in government can expect to keep fire arms.

My advice to liberals and republicans alike is to study the delegate model of representation and make use of it. Continue worshipping politicians and you can expect the same results you are getting now. You can also expect more of those on the edge now to go on over as in do mass school shootings and other things.

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.