Hillary Clinton’s Emails and Natural Law

maxresdefaultNatural law is available to anyone who is interested. Natural law is not written down formally. It works and no one knows why. The New and Old Testaments are full of models of natural law. The stories describe behavior that repeats endlessly. Many ancient biases are explained throughout ancient writings.

What natural law is applicable with respect to Hillary Clinton and her email situation? In Kings I and II there are countless parallels. The stories of King David’s crimes are clearly written so that readers will ask. “What is wrong with this picture?” But, the question is seldom asked.

Throughout history, leaders have lived their lives above the law and they still do. Strangely, the public accepts the bad behavior. King David committed murder and suffered no legal consequences. Hillary Clinton will likely escape any consequences for breaking national security laws. Common people think of their leaders as their betters today, just as they did in biblical times.

Hillary Clinton has a multitude of worshipers. They will protect her and keep her from being brought to justice. Why? They have the same world view as the one she conveys.  Anything that causes Hillary to be less esteemed causes her worshipers to suffer an esteem loss also.

Don’t misunderstand, leaders do suffer consequences of immoral acts. The suffering in just not immediately traceable to the act in question.

Scriptures are actually safe for atheists and agnostics to read provided the stories are only studied as sources of natural law. Jews can even read the New Testament without getting cooties.  If you ever want to know how something is going to turn out, find a parallel in the scriptures. It works.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.