Honoring Our Mercenaries

140224-us-army-troops-9a_b5e4b8a711a81c61b51a04bb26d218d0One of the disadvantages of living a fantasy free life is that the truth always turns out to be worse than the fantasy the unpleasant truth replaces.

Mercenary soldiers fight on behalf of the group with the balance of political power. When government turns corrupt, mercenaries end up fighting for corrupt causes.  Soldiers then fight for certain members of the population and never get close to fighting for an actual freedom based cause.  Soldiers are not children. They take an oath to defend the constitution but generally don’t take the time to read it. As an adult, each soldier has to make personal moral decisions. Thinking the country is always right and that God is always on our side is an irresponsible posture to assume.

Immoral governments constantly send soldiers to fight immoral wars. An army can serve as a hit squad for billionaires. That is the essence of our Mideast campaigns.  Few Americans realize that in 1953 the Unites States overthrew the only democratically elected government Iran has ever had. This action was on behalf of the U.S. petroleum industry. Although we sent no troops, the coup was our initiative. Now we are at the end of a series of Mideast engagements, all of which have roots extending back to our belligerent act of 1953. Given that, it is hard to take the moral high ground in anything that has to do with Mideast policy.

Our soldiers today are mercenaries. Each one has a moral obligation to question what he is doing before expecting to be treated as a hero for participating in an immoral war.

 

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.