How Not to Fight Big Government

Nothing has changed over history’s long timeline. Technically Americans have authority over their government. They choose not to use it. Instead they follow the historical norm of seeking messiahs to go to Washington and fix all of their problems. More than a few politicians are willing to make the offer. The result is always bigger and more expensive government.
Each citizen professes a belief in representative government but rejects the role of actually supervising elected officials. Conservatives have lost ground every year since the American Revolution. Still conservatives engage in messiah seeking as their preferred method of controlling government.
The alternative is to assume authority over the president and lawmakers, forcing them to represent citizens in the strictest sense. In all of record history, the ladder approach has never been tried. Citizens overwhelmingly reject this kind of true representation which is called the delegate model of representation.
Conservatives everywhere are ranting about the constitution and returning the country to its glory days. These conservatives have never studied history. There were no glory days and the constitution has been regularly disregard since the day the founding fathers all signed it. Our government has always been stable but congress has never represented constituents in anything other than a vague sense.
Over the years ordinary citizens have made gains but only when they have pressured government from outside the political system. The civil rights and anti-Vietnam war movement are good examples.
Conservatives can either work creatively outside the system or be resigned to continue losing the quality of life they appreciate.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.