Impending Stock Market Crash?

122216R3000The chart shows the Russell 3000 Index in black charted along with the percent of its components above the 200 day moving average. This chart like many others being published this week show that the averages are being carried higher by only a small number of stocks.

In other times this would be a harbinger of a serious decline in the immediate future. It is still a very bad sign but we must remember that there is a politically untouchable system of organized support pushing the market higher. Odinary investors have only money they have earned to trade with. That money is theirs to lose. Gains and losses don’t concern central banks. Don’t think for a moment that all central banks are not buying outright with money that is virtually imagined into existance

That doesn’t render indicators useless. It does make it impossible to make a meaningful forecast with respect to timing. Back in the early fall, I cautioned readers to discount the possibility of an October selloff. The same bearish indicators were present at that time. The market is not going to crash here unless the Federal Reserve is completely taken by surprise with a sudden swamp of supply. Odds of that happening is slim. The vast majority in the U.S. still completely trust government and are completely clueless about what Federal Reserve policy has to do with stock prices.

Remember that Wall Street and international banks have hired government to make and keep them profitable. Of course this is a huge disadvantage to average Americans who are completely unaware that there is a problem.

I am still 78% in cash. The big deal here is protecting assets even if it means foregoing any return at all in the interem. The only thing relevent to predicting a crash is determining when the American public will wake up and discover they are being robbed.

Download Just Another Day at the Whorehouse

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.