Megyn Kelly Just Doing Her Job

Megyn_KellyNormally the Republican National Committee (RNC) decides who is going to emerge as the candidate. Any candidate who is perceived as less than accommodating to the agendas of the elite donor class is destroyed as quickly as possible. During the 2012 primaries Rick Perry was destroyed as fast as possible. Taking out Ron Paul took more time. Republican voters never have much say so as to who runs for president on the Republican ticket.

In modern times, news organizations do not deliver the news according to what people need to know. They are instrumental in managing public opinion in ways that bolsters their media income. The news media now works hand in hand with other institutions which have the same motive in managing public opinion. This way the people at the top get what they want out of government. The vote, as a tool for controlling government, has been largely neutralized.

Fox news always assists the Republican National Committee in getting rid of candidates the Republican National Committee feel might threaten the success of candidates of their choosing. Megyn Kelley’s job during the debate was to destroy Donald Trump. Kelly would be less valuable to Fox News as an employee it she did anything other than try and discredit trump. A news announcer does not necessarily need to know much about any particular subject. News announcers need to read well and speak clearly. Kelly does those things very well.

The effort to destroy Trump’s candidacy is completely normal in politics. Don’t forget that news people go into these things with questions written by others. They are only the voices of the companies they work for. In other words, Megyn Kelly was only singing the song. She didn’t write the lyrics. Blaming her is like blaming a waitress for a cooks bad cooking. Megyn’s job was to take out Donald Trump and she tried.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.