Money Transfer Engines

Institutions leaders and humans beings are defined a certain way and unwary naive economists base their work on these definitions. Because I am fantasy free, my work is based on how leaders and institutions and people actually function.

The Federal Reserve is defined as a necessary institution critical to the performance of the economy and the wellbeing of society. In actual practice, the only thing the Federal Reserve does is serve as a money transfer engine. Money is transferred from all who have little or no political power to others who are powerful enough to dictate government policy.

Keynesian Deficit spending is defined as a necessary practice useful in stimulating the economy when aggregate demand is lacking. Governments do not make economic decisions although they are deemed as doing so. Governments only make political decisions. The result is that that deficit spending does not stimulate the economy. Deficit spending, like monetary policy serves as a money transfer engine. Deficit spending entails giving contracts to and supporting businesses which pay with political contributions for the results they want. The wealth transfer is permanent. Any resulting increase in economic activity is only temporary. Deficit spending interrupts the out with the old and in with the new principle that free market economics is based on. As time goes on the nation’s resources become more and more mis-allocated until a crash occurs.

Human beings are popularly defined as close to divine to having a high natural intrinsic value. In close relationships that definition may hold. In the aggregate it does not hold at all. People are deemed to be unique, freedom loving and independent minded. In actual practice it doesn’t work that way at all. Freedom is treated like an asset and is traded for comfort and reassurance.  The notion that government is like a benevolent parent providing for everyones needs is too comforting to reject. Government as a whole ends up serving primarily as a money transfer engine. All bills on which congress votes serve to rig one market or another. The public naively believes government performs according to the definition that is given.

Many wonder why the upper one tenth of one percent have such a high portion of the nation’s wealth. I have just explained why.

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.