Anyone who reads this blog even occasionally may grasp the value of the circumstantial evidence  I frequently cite, showing that the stock market is not managed solely by the Federal Reserve, but  split second by split second. It is also managed by the media or more accurately by  those who control what the media writes. This is not accepted in the slightest by even the most astute market analysts in the country.

Is circumstantial evidence relevant in economic issues?

Well, in the United State, by way of the  legal system, based circumstantial evidence, defendants are routinely sent to prison. Often criminals are put to death based on circumstantial evidence? Few argue with the with the outcome of trials where circumstantial has been the deciding factor. Are there are in fact bad jury decisions? Are the decisions any better if if these they are handed down from the bench? Think through those two two questions.

Who wants to do away with the jury system and give total total legal authority to judges and bureaucracies? Our founding fathers did not think so. Do you want to do away with the jury system yourself? If you do, give it a try and see how many followers you can get.

My question now is, “Is circumstantial evidence of no use in analyzing the financial markets? If you don’t believe it is, there isn’t much reason for reading this blog. Whether it involves economic issues or the stock market, circumstantial evidence is mostly what I use. I will say that if you read this blog anyway, you will eventually find my ideas quite helpful and useful.

Are citizens so dim witted, that we must make sure they don’t have the meaningful information, because they would make life make life miserable for all of us.? Citizens themselves believe they are. Congress insists that they are. I myself got slaughtered running for congress for making the that they are not.

With that being said, this short article is sourced in both circumstantial evidence as well as natural law. Below, you will see the following headline I copied from a an  article this morning.

Futures Rebound On Hopes Of Resuming Ukraine Negotiations, Oil Soars To Decade High 

Anything wrong with this Headline? It is all true. But, as a means of manipulating the public, the driving force behind the stock market, according to the media, is reduced down to one concern. This technique has been used over and over again for many decades. If my memory serves my correctly, John Kenneth Galbraith gave examples of this in his classic, The Great Society, in the 1950’s. There is an interesting aspect to insight. Over time meat spoils. Insight never spoils. It has an eternal life span. Don’t disregard what Galbraith wrote in the fifties. Insight is initially treated a a threat. I scares authority. Look where insight  got Galileo. Look where it got Jesus. look at where it has gotten so many bright people who get censored by social media outlets.

People are easier to to manipulate, if the the criteria they are being presented is reduced down to one available notion.

I like the phrase “Lets Go Brandon.” .To heck with Joe Biden. This phrase could easily morph into something more meaningful. I would like to see be the standard phrase to be used more as, a here we go again mantra anytime we are exposed to a mercenary public figure or institution which is pushing a sinister agenda over the public.