Presidunce Of The United States

Presidunce Of The United States PDF Version

Suppose Joe Biden winds up being elected president.  Are there any upsides to having a president with dementia? Perhaps there is, maybe.

His title could become Presidunce of the United States instead of President of the United states. Think of the entertainment that would provide Americans of all ages. Comedians would have a field day,

A cardboard cutout could be put in the president’s chair in the oval office. The country might discover that a cardboard cutout of a president is just as effective as an actual human being.

Biden might forget who owns him and fail to  support the agendas of his corporate sponsors.  He might get confused about which foreign country to bomb.

His dementia could cause him to be an ineffective president. An effective president is one who convinces ordinary citizens to promote their own poverty and fall on a sword for the interests he genuinely supports. We already have a president who does these things. Trump has convinced Americans overall that a trade war is a good deal. Already, Trump is already preventing the Chinese from subsidizing American Consumers. Trump sponsored the biggest fiscal stimulus package in the history of the world. Of course that impoverishes his constituents.  Real wages are as much as guaranteed to continue declining for at least the next ten years. Trump supporters love this. Trump has already funneled multitudes of wealth from the bottom of the economy to the top. These are the things an effective president does. Trump is such an effective president that his followers are happy to have less if that is what he wants them to have.  After all Trump supporters get to wear MAGA hats knowing that with Trump in charge the United States will return to the greatness it possessed in an earlier time period.  What period was that?

Perhaps that period would be when Davey Crocket was president,Paul Bunyon was Vice President and John Henry was Secretary of State.

When Times Got Really Weird MP3

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.