Quantitative Easing Has Not Failed!

Download PDF Version

5-New-Lies-That-The-Federal-Reserve-Is-Telling-The-American-People-300x225Today I read a number of comments by mainstream economists who are now saying quantitative easing has failed. There are two reasons for quantitative easing. There is the ostensible reason and the real reason. Quantitative easing for the ostensible reason has of course failed. There has never been a reason why it would have succeeded. Quantitative easing has never been based on a complete theory and it was never has been tested.

But the real reason for engaging is quantitative easing was to protect the assets and income of the investor class. Quantitative easing is only the tail end of the program. Early in the George W. Bush administration government began managing the financial markets. By summer of 2006 financial markets were clearly becoming distressed. Henry Paulson was appointed as treasury secretary for the express purpose of building a consortium of financial players who would join the government in enhancing asset prices. Paulson’s efforts were monumental but the crisis of 2008 was unstoppable. TARP was initiated and quantitative easing has followed.

In 2008 the rich were taken off guard. This time when the market crashes, the big losers will be ordinary folks with IRAs. Ordinary folks have already lost the interest they would have earned in a free market setting. Now most will lose everything they have set aside for retirement.

Quantitative easing has been a tremendous success because its real purpose has been achieved completely. No one with a PHD from an Ivy league school really believes quantitative easing was anything other than a political initiative for protecting the investor class. Don’t expect any of them to admit that.

Euphemism Mountain
The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.