Serious Ass Covering Has Started

NeumanAn additional difference between Common Sense Economics and Ivy League economics is that we observe what is actually happening in the world outside of numbers. Again, numbers are great for building bridges and rocket ships. In studying economics which is based on human behavior, numbers are of very little help.  Of course numbers are the best friends of economists who are paid to lie to make a living. Only they know where the numbers come from and they can count on everyone else to believe them based on their credentials. Hundreds of years pass without a government economist being right about anything but Americans still believe them. This process will cost you everything you have and everything you have any chance of getting unless you join the invisible three percent who think regularly. We would be glad to have you. The herd mentality is only the default mode. Anyone can make the switch.

In the past week or so, I have noticed that Yahoo news is starting to publish some truthful articles concerning the stock market and the economy. Here is one of them.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/experts-worry-phony-numbers-misleading-070222254.html

Until this time, all news outlets have published only articles that are 100% supportive of government, the financial sector and corporate interests. The news media will tell any lie that augments their bottom line up to the point where there is a chance they will look stupid.

We have reached that point so expect other news organization to start giving readers a teaspoon taste of the truth.  This way when the crash and misery come, they will have a place to point and say, “See we were on top of at all along. No one here is surprised.

 

00_logo_1

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

One thought on “Serious Ass Covering Has Started

  1. jean

    The AP article blames ‘analysts’ for misleading investors about actual earnings, but all the media would’ve needed to do was to report both GAAP and non-GAAP earnings. Investors then would’ve had a clearer image of reality. But media over and over again reported only non-GAAP ‘earnings’ without ever acknowledging that the ‘earnings’ were based on only the fanciful financial engineering that masquerades as prosperity in the real economy. The end may indeed be near. Maybe.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.