Sin, Economics and Your Government

To really understand economics, it is necessary to know what sin is. Those who go to church hear about sin constantly. But, preachers have no idea what constitutes sin. Sin actually has little to do with the gospel and is a concept even atheists can use.

Sin is any transaction where costs are guaranteed to be greater than benefits. Smoking is not a sin because people who smoke are bad. Smoking is a sin because the costs to the smoker and the rest of society are greater than the benefits. The smoker does get benefits but they are all in the moment. The costs continue to accumulate unless the smoker quits. In that case, money has been spent and the body has been damaged. The costs remain but the stream of pleasure has ceased.

A rational person does not sin because it is irrational to bring harm to oneself. There is a reason why Jesus’s ministry was focused on those committing sins while little was said about folks who were sinned against. Sin causes bad outcomes.

So, what kinds of sins are hurting the economy? The all time biggest sin of the individual citizen is that of believing lies. Lies provide comfort while the truth causes stress. While constituents wallow in their comfort, elected officials concentrate of serving the politically powerful players who can help the politician reach personal goals and aspirations. Given a high degree of comfort citizens will never rein in government, which is their responsibility.

When the economic collapse accelerates, we can safely say, that the misery is a consequence of sin. When believing lies, costs do always add up to more than the benefits. Truth is used in government only on the rare occasions when it has utility politically.

One thing that is never heard as last words on a death bed is, “I truly regret that I didn’t believe more lies.”

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.