Some are Starting to Get It About the Global Crime Syndicate.

I don’t know Jordan Peterson. I am a great admirer of his work.
He has a lot to say and it is generally right on the money.
In this video, he refers to “Global Utopians”.

“Global elitists” have no natural incentive to make a utopia for the good of the people. They have every incentive to capture and control the world’s factors of production. They also have every incentive to guide the thinking of the public.

As horrible as it is, academics must see the the situation as it really is.
The global utopians are not ideologically driven. This is a global crime syndicate and still much more sinister than do a group of liberal elitists pushing a socialist agenda. When and if our academics describe the global elitists as a crime syndicate, we will have made monumental progress.

This is a good video to watch, even though the global culprits are mis-identified.

My comment on Dr. Peterson’s channel

Years ago I correctly identified the Deep State as exactly what it is. It is a global crime syndicate that controls the essence of every powerful politician in the world.
The Deep State Exposed

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

4 thoughts on “Some are Starting to Get It About the Global Crime Syndicate.

  1. Anonymous

    Yeah you make a good point about what exactly comes next after this so-called ‘Great Reset’ plan crashes and burns. The example that I keep thinking about is the French Revolution. I’m mildly ashamed to admit that I’ve had fantasies of enjoying a big ‘off with their heads’ moment because the current group of criminals are so utterly evil but I realize that’s just a visceral, highly emotional and kind of reactionary thought on my part. After all, after the Jacobins failed in came riding the Man on the White Horse and he was no friend of liberty or freedom.

    Reply
    1. Fantasy Free Economics Post author

      I have had this “fantasy” for a long time important people being paraded across the TV screen in handcuffs.
      I guess the French turned out better off and never had a king again. But, after the revolution they had Neapolitan.

      Who knows? My wife doesn’t think the fall election will take place. It makes sense. As it is today, the demcramts would lose big time and our betters boats would sink.

      Reply
  2. Anonymous

    Another little glimmer of hope I’ve seen recently that makes me think the global crime syndicate is panicking is that U.N. head Antonio Gutierrez recently hired the demonic Klaus Schwab & his World Economic Forum to ‘accelerate’ Agenda 2030. They know millions of people are waking up and it’s now or never. That tells me that short term we may have to go through a hundred miles of HELL but these evil, corrupt fools will fail. There are too many moving parts to their globalist scheme and they are moving way too fast and making a lot of exploitable mistakes. I do fear they may kill a lot of people on their way out the door though.

    Reply
    1. Fantasy Free Economics Post author

      I think you are right that the current culprits will be gone.
      When chaos takes over I personally don’t start anticipating outcomes. The possibilities are endless.

      I hope you are right.
      Realistically thinking, the notion that humans are freedom loving entities is a myth.
      Politics is instinctively driven. In keeping with laws of dominance and subservience, people are most likely to submit to the most belligerent to emerge. There is no telling what kind of tyrant folks will get behind and follow.
      Look what the Germans did in the 1930s.
      Men like Moses or Josephs only appear once in many eons. Notice that in the past when societies have failed always get behind a tyrant and end up even worse off. How many times has Argentina fallen apart only to get behind a leader, worse than the one they got rid of? WE have the recent example of Venezuela. The Cubans got rid of Batista and adopted Fidel Castro.
      There are things people can do. I am still the only one in my neighborhood with yard signs. People can write letters to their state’s attorney general and ask for help with 1st amendment rights.
      The wait for someone to fix it syndrome is in play all around the country.
      I am foregoing judgement and am just waiting.
      If I had to pick a likely outcome, it would be that when one fight ends, another will begin.
      I realize my assessment seems dark. When I look at historical precedents, that is just the way it comes out.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Fantasy Free Economics Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.