Stimulus Stimulus Stimulus Up Next

Stimulus Stimulus Stimulus Up Next PDF Version

Stimulus is a political tool and nothing else.  Stimulus provides politicians a way to reward the parties who support their essence and make their acquisitions of more power possible. The cost to the overall population is staggering.

Thinking is not allowed in economics if one wants to get paid. Since I am doing this for nothing, I can think to my hearts content. You can think also provided your life and income do not depend upon your not thinking.

Stimulus does have an effect on the economy but it is not the ostensible effect that is the stated goal of the initiative.

So, does the economy need to be stimulated with monetary policy or fiscal policy now or at any other time? The answer is yes if you are a politician, the actual recipient of the initial money or an average citizen who unwittingly believes anything he is told.

It is understood and acknowledged, even by economists, that any stimulus program  must be completely objective. In order to be objective, an economic decision is completely necessary. Given that governments can only make political decisions, objectivity is not possible.

How, is it known that stimulus needs to be implemented? That requires a reliable forecast? When was the last time economists, even the best in the world have made reliable forecasts? This is a skill economists don’t have.

Any stimulus is added at a time when all are clueless as to what is coming next.

Stimulus is provided regardless. The money is always used by the initial  recipients  to make as much money  as they possibly can in the shortest period of time. Hence, our current stock market bubble.

Are you studying economics? Show this to your professor and ask if he agrees. Ask Gerome Powell if he agrees? Then ask, if either cares to debate me. What I am telling you hear is self evident,. So, is it possible for anything to be self evident? According to the U.S. constitution the posture of self-evident is completely viable.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

So, here comes the next round of stimulus? Who benefits and who loses?

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.