Stock Market and Republican Debates

Below are two articles from a few weeks back. As it turns out, organized support has been ample in countering the traditional weakness during the month of October.

Stock Market Through October

Stock Market Through December 2015

This is a gift to stock holders, at least those who can get out before it all comes down. In a genuine market there is an ebb and flow to prices throughout the day that is not present in this one. In a real market, prices hit small air pockets from time to time throughout the day. During a short squeeze that is not sponsored, there is not a steady push from the bottom up. A planned move has recognizable demand evenly distributed throughout the day and bolstered during critical time periods. The patterns are recognizable as clockwork. Odds are that organized support will be adequate to keep a rally of sorts going  into year end. How and when will this change? Few investors acknowledge the wink and nod system that keeps corporate insiders, privateer firms and open market committee members all working together and in control of the market.

Still, none of this can be taken as a given. For example, if the open market committee can no longer efficiently guarantee corporations they will profit from buybacks more central banks will have to buy and hold stocks directly. The central banks have to be willing and the public must remain unaware of just how this kind of thing limits their income and destroys the overall economy. So far, the public remains docile and uninvolved. Corporations are still reporting non gap earnings, using every accounting trick known to man and violating securities laws with impunity. Do not forget that a high stock price is a pay day to a corporate insider, independent of any real profit. Buybacks are the quickest and most reliable way for insiders to pay themselves.

Why did I mention the debates? The Republican Primaries are getting more competitive. Who will be the first candidate to point out the fact that equities market are and have been rigged? This is all more than an exercise in making money for the manipulators and the donor class. This is a power struggle and an important one. Power is more desirable even than money and it is largely interchangeable. Even candidates who are in opposition to them will protect the investor class as a path of least resistance. Don’t ever think that politicians understand the financial markets. I guarantee you that they don’t. As campaigns get more intense, politicians will become more willing to make waves where they otherwise would not.

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.