The Death of Nelson Mandela

The world’s reaction to the death of Nelson Mandela showcases the mentality that prevents self government from working. Many governments around the world claim to be governed by their citizens. The U.S. is organized as a republic and most citizens are convinced that it operates in that capacity.
Self government requires citizens to keep a tight rein on their leaders. Citizens worship them instead. The aspiration of every voter is to find a messiah who will fight for causes on his behalf.
Politicians run for office to obtain power and pursue their own goals and aspiration. Once in office, they represent those who help them build a power base and present them with profit opportunities.
Only sociopaths have the people skills needed to compete successfully in politics. Many South Africans benefited from the efforts of Nelson Mandela but not because he was a good person with high values. Those who benefited from Nelson Mandela as a leader were useful to him.
For 50,000+ years, governments have provided an efficient means for people who rise to the top to profit from the efforts of ordinary folk. The American Revolution did not put an end to this system. For 237 years folk have been trading their freedom for comfort and security just as they did when they served a king. Passing laws and writing constitutions does little to change behavior that is caused by instinct and eons of conditioning.
The world’s worshiping of leaders along with massive displays of recreational grief serve as evidence that true self government will not exist on the globe for another 1000 or so years.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.