The Evil Institution of Patriotism

Morality is the source of goodness whereby citizens take up arms against invaders and and right wrongs. Moral people protect their country from evil doers at home and sometimes in foreign lands. Morality is what causes people to do what is right on behalf of others by putting themselves in danger.

Patriotism is the force that causes the unwitting to take up the causes of psychopaths, rob other countries of their riches and enslave whole countries. The Germans who gave their lives for Germany during WWII were possibly history’s greatest patriots. The forces which defeated Hitler called themselves patriots but they were really just moral people doing what the moral thing under critical circumstances.

American citizens have mostly fought as patriots furthering the aspirations of evil leaders who had no morals at all. Napoleon’s troops were patriots. Caesar’s soldiers were patriots. Even though the troops who landed on Normandy call themselves patriots. they were actually just moral people doing what was right to turn back evil. Confederate soldiers fighting for the south were patriots.

Today all over social media, folks are calling themselves patriots. What that means is they will support and fight for any evil cause their leader asks them to. They virtue signal calling themselves patriots but they are really volunteering to support their country in the exercise of evil.

Patriotism is not what is needed. It is a destructive force. Morality is a better choice. Saying “The end justifies the means.” really means,  “we are going to use evil to get what we want.” Saying “The means determines the end.” is a way of conveying the message, “We are going to do what is right regardless of the consequences.” “We are going to do the moral thing and that will guarantee the best possible outcome.”

Sometimes doing what is moral, is the reason for taking up arms. If arms are taken up for any other reason it is out of patriotism. So, what is moral? That is a great philosophical question and can be the source of endless debate. It it turns out to be a tough question, fine it can be hashed out. Normally what is the moral thing to do is completely obvious.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.