The Fall Stock Market Crash

September through October is crash season for the stock market just like July through early autumn is hurricane season. Some years there are no hurricanes. In all but a few years there is no Stock Market crash. Generally there is a little market weakness in the fall but nothing dramatic.

The stock market is way overvalued. Few dispute that. The economy is falling apart right before our eyes. So, doesn’t it make sense that the market would crash in the fall? It makes so much sense that big money is hedged up to its eyeballs. It makes perfect sense except that stock prices are being aggressively managed. Despite years of organized intervention in the stock market, all but a few still subscribe to the dogma relevant to a market that is governed buy supply and demand.

Plans are in force to prevent any serious fall weakness. Traders are lined up on the starting line just waiting for the starting gun to go off. This mind set is easily exploited. I am keeping my powder dry and staying in cash. Having cash on hand when the eventual collapse comes is much more important to me than trying to make a killing on one or two disastrous days.

There will be no limits on resources devoted to supporting the market this fall. So, I am not shorting.

Don’t forget that central banks are being used to consolidate and control the factors of production of the major economies of the world. Their buying will be without limit any time markets are in serious stress. Part of this is driven by political agendas. Don’t forget that central banks will buy to protect their existing equity portfolios.

When will stock prices drop? Probably it will not happen until the economy and political system are damaged beyond repair. That exact moment is not knowable.

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.