The Unaware

unawareTalk radio hosts give the impression that they have studied issues and present themselves as being on top of the passing scene. Don’t be fooled. Conservative spokespersons are no different in the way their understanding has progressed than many of the 60s radicals. Their spiel never changes when new information emerges.

Early in their careers they learned a few conservative ideas. They have stuck to the only ideas they understand. Circumstances have changed. The conservative movement is very much alive but the seasoned talk show hosts are not part of it.

beck

No Radio Talk Show host will say much that is contrary to the interests of networks and advertisers. Entitlements and social programs are fair game. Pro-business and fascism are off limits.

I have not found one who has snapped to the fact that the growth of government is being caused from the top down. Not one understands that it is not pressure from the poor and displaced that is causing unrestrained growth of government.

I don’t think it is actually out of ignorance that they are failing to understand. They are not what they claim to be. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are the worst and most damaging because they have such large audiences. Rather than educate listeners as to genuine threats, they exploit the sentiment that is already available.

This is the nature of broadcasting. It is all about building an audience and it makes little difference what content attracts an audience.

Any fool can look out the window and see that there is a bigger problem than poor people trying to get something for nothing from government. Chances are the radio folks are indeed clueless and never really waved the conservative banner for any other reason than to build an audience.

In the minds of “conservatives” today, pro-business is pro-capitalism. Conservative talk radio hosts all fit into this category. Of course this is non-sense. The fascist cancer that has infected the country is far more threatening than anything that is discussed on the radio.

Why have things worked out this way? It has to do with incentives. Even Ivy League economists understand incentives, although they ignore them. Talk radio hosts owe their income and popularity to the kind of organizations which profit by using government to rig markets, capture customers and control public opinion. There isn’t a way Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are going to point fingers at the hands that feed them.

Fascism is the most serious threat the United States has ever faced and the very people who could create an awareness of the problem are busy nurturing it along. The Fascist cancer can only be turned back by rank and file citizens. You really have no one with power or influence on your side.00_logo_1

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.