The Way Governments Are Born

Any time an aggregation of people find themselves in the same place at the same time, a hierarchy forms. It even happens in kindergarten. The game of dominance and subservience begins and continues. In time the weak end up serving the strong in return for security and other benefits. Mostly this all occurs peacefully. Offers to serve are made and leaders ask to be followed.

All governments are of this nature. Some become complex like the United States. All of it is based on the manifestation of self interest. Again, the incentive to serve is purely imaginary.

Big problems occur when citizens imagine that government can and will do things that it has no capacity to do. Regardless of what anyone says or thinks there is never anything going on outside of dominating and serving. Serving out of self interest is different than being born with a determination to make people’s lives better. No matter how complex the system is all that is ever going on is interaction of people resolving the issue of dominance and subservience.

Government has no way to successfully manage people’s lives and make guarantees of outcomes. Dominance and subservience are all there is. Notice that government seems to be failing at all of the tasks it is charged with performing. That is because there has never been a way for government to successfully do those things in the first place. Now, there are huge profits to be made by engaging in the effort. There is no net benefit.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.