Trump the Conservative

donald-trump-conservative-conversionConservatives are conned by GOP Conservative rhetoric. Liberals are conned by liberal Democrat rhetoric. Neither side has any representation. To date, the right to vote has been adequately neutralized although for the most part, voters believe they are important in determining policy. The billionaires club controls government.  Until this year voting has been rendered cosmetic. Elected officials everywhere are terrified of being controlled by the electorate. Trump is a conservative. Ted Cruz pretends to be a conservative.

What constitutes a conservative? Shortly after TARP in 2008 a conservative was someone who vote against TARP or a talk show host who never got on board. Using this criteria, there were hardly any  conservatives to mention. Time has passed. The new criteria is, that of working towards closing at least one and hopefully more government agencies.

Trump has proposed closing the Department of Education. This is the only conservative position a Republican politician has had since Calvin Coolidge refused to allow he expansion of the federal government prior to the Great Depression. Possibly Reagan’s deregulation efforts could qualified but that is about it. Reagan did so much to usher in central economic planning that the deregulation thing is hardly noticeable.

Ted Cruz calls himself a conservative but plans on supporting the billionaires club with the flat or “fair tax.”  His financing comes from the financial sector, so he is their advocate.

So far in the Republican primary race Trump is the only one to propose an actual conservative solution. Close government agencies and repeal bad laws. That is what a conservative does. There are none, but Trump is closer than the others.

The Grazin’ is Good, by Curbside Jimmy.

Available at: Curbside Jimmy’s Free mp3 Download Page

00_logo_1




This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.