Understanding the Immigration Issue

i12333magesFinding causes of problems as well as solutions in economics is actually very simple. I say solution but problems are not actually solved. There are trade offs instead. Society gains the most when trade offs result in the most positive outcome. That is all that can be done.

Almost any economic problem is caused by a lack of faith in the free market system. Solutions are seldom seen because the solution is distasteful or at least requires deferred gratification. Countless hours and dollars are devoted to coming up with palatable solutions none of which are viable. A constitutional amendment promising the separation of government and the economy would benefit every living soul in the country. Such an amendment is not possible because free markets are not trusted.

The immigration issue is nothing more than a labor market issue. People in the United states are paid a lot higher to do the same work that people with as much or more education receive for doing the same work in other countries. Laws passed in the United States for the purpose of rigging markets have a devastating effect on third world nations. When the gasoline industry was rigged so that all gas contained ethanol third world people could no longer afford to eat. U.S, drug laws which do nothing to prevent usage, provide high profit margins for the drug cartels in Mexico. Crime has taken over Mexico and had destroyed many natural opportunities. All of these things encourage immigration.

There is no way to slow down immigration with out doing one or more of a few things. The only way to stem the tide without reforming U,S. Drug laws and economic policies is to be completely brutal in enforcing the law. This is the way the Berlin Wall functioned and it worked for the most part.

The only genuine non violent method that will work is to return to free markets here in the U.S. and repeal laws that impoverish citizens of poor countries. When there is such a huge gap in what comparable jobs pay in different countries, countries that pay well are going to get immigrants.

This solution is not viable right now because its implementation would require faith in free markets and that is lacking world wide. I promise, no other approach would generate as positive an outcome.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.