Update on the Possibility of War

Earlier this month, I put out a notice that based on the various cross currents in play, there would be no war. At that time, I saw a better chance the rumblings would be used to draw short sellers into the stock market, to squeeze in order to help generate a huge rally. News would be the Catalyst. I worked out that way. I have made new fantasy free observations and need to make an update.

I am Forecasting no War  from April 10, 2017

Now chances are are that there actually will be war of some kind or some kind of devastating economic development, perhaps both. What has changed?

First understand that I have no meaningful information. You have none either. Congress and the rest of government do not disseminate information to the public. An ignorant population is no threat to those engaged in the power and money grab free for all.

Despite claims to the contrary, government’s most prominent and overriding function is to keep asset prices high and moving higher. The shock of even a normal stock market correction, not to mention a crash would throw the economy into a major tailspin. War may or may not be inevitable but it is very very likely. Strings of economic disappointments and major events are an absolute certainty. Timing on these things is hard. It is like trying to predict the exact date an obese person with a damaged heart is going to die. Exactly when is not knowable.

Certainly an event or a number of events are in the offing for the immediate future. Just because you have no information does not mean there is none. It means it is not desirable to have ordinary people know the ins and outs about what is really going on.

If asset prices are going to fall it is advantageous to the consortium which manipulates markets to have them drop from the highest possible level. After the decline begins no effort will be spared in trying to stabilize  prices and reverse the decline. Look first for central banks to control the rate of decline and then try to make a consolidation the first moment volume moderates. From a consolidation efforts will then be focused on slowly ratcheting prices higher, drawing in shorts to squeeze and finally attempting to rally the market back into an uptrend.

How do I know these things? I don’t know anymore than you do. I do understand the incentive of the folks involved and know what to expect from them.

Keep this in mind. Any stock market decline has the chance of snowballing. There is no guarantee the tools of manipulation will continue to work given a big enough issue. What I am describing is how the manipulators will try to deal with the downturn.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.