Watch the Russell 2000

This is a repost to illustrate the point that a strong Russell 2000 telegraphs enormous organized support for stock prices. Notice that while the Dow is under pressure the Russell 2000 is in the green. The weight on the market is enormous. Organized support is enormous also.

In my last stock market manipulation post, I pointed out the importance of the Russell 2000, in telegraphing efforts of organized support when the market is under pressure.

Notice that when markets all over the world are down around one percent, the Russell 2000 is in the green as of mid day. There is much more pressure on the market than what than what the averages indicate. When organize support is in the crash prevention mode, everything gets some central bank buying. On days like today, only the Russell 2000 and a few of the central bank favorites are strong.

Supporting the Russell 2000 is like trying to blow just enough wind on a feather to get it to  move only one inch. The Russel 2000 is so thin, it is hard to support it just enough and they always overshoot their target.

There is lots of supply starting to hit the market and it will only increase. What we still don’t know is what heroic measures will be taken, to protect the assets of the world’s richest citizens. The selling won’t end. It will come down to how much central banks will buy? Will their political directive be withdrawn? Will ordinary citizens figure out they are being fleeced and rebel? Either the central banks will end up controlling the worlds factors of production in terms of capitalization or stocks will go down a lot. Regardless, the efforts to save asset values are still enormous and relentless.The Swamp My Puppy Dog and I is another timely Curbside Jimmy song.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.