What Money Really Is

gBeing fantasy free I can tell fact from fiction. Mainstream academics cannot because they are saturated with fantasies and comforting beliefs. Typically an explanation by an Ivy League economist is generated out of a need to say something.

Money is not what they claim it is. Governments don’t actually create money. Money that is claimed to be created by a government is really no different than counterfeit money and it is used for the same purpose. In a real sense, money is not actually created by anyone. Money emerges when work is performed and goods need to be exchanged. Work is what creates value and without value, money is not necessary. A government creates no value and thus cannot create money. Counterfeit money is brought into existence as a way to get value without working. As long as governments create counterfeit money, there will be economic disasters like the one we are beginning to experience in the United States.

Here is what money really is. The right amount of money for an economy is never an exact amount because one of the variables that determines the right amount is not constant. Very simply, money represents what is received for work (output) plus borrowed money in amounts that can reasonably be expected to be repaid. There is always uncertainty as to whether or not money can be repaid. That cannot be helped but it is the best we can do. Money created by governments cannot be repaid and never will be repaid, That by itself is not that bad but the result is an eventual economic disaster. Work determines who gets real money. Political power determines who gets the counterfeit money and it all spends the same. When governments create money, it is used to extract wealth and income out of the general population. The people at the bottom eventually become too impoverished to support the people at the top, That is when the economy, social order and political system break down, not necessarily in that order.

Why don’t mainstream economists realize this? It is hard to be an honest economist and hold a job, Economists support the world view of the people who pay them. No one is going to pay an economist to discourage government from creating money. Economics as it is taught in universities really isn’t economics at all. It is accounting. Numbers are given meaning but the only meaning they really have is rooted in the incentive that gives rise to the number. Incentives are interactive. Change one incentive and all related incentives change also. Variables which are treated as constants are not constants at all but change also when the variable that is deemed to be independent changes.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.