When Folks Don’t Suffer

Why does a government go to such great extents to insure the population is comfortable and happy? When the news you hear is dampened so much that it is never completely frightening, there is a reason.

All kinds of lofty ideas can be given as the purpose of government. Certainly the stated reasons for the necessity of government  are good. Take your pick. The way things work in the real world are quite a bit different from what works on paper.

More than anything, government serves as a way for the smartest people in the world to fleece any given country’s citizens.

When the citizens are comfortable they simply do not question authority. The relationship between a citizen and government takes on the characteristics of a dog and master arrangement. The dog is always on the side of the person who feeds it. As long as the dog is fed and comfortable, the chances it will run off and stay gone are slim. Even a dog that jumps the fence and runs around the neighborhood shows up at feeding time. The relationship the masses have with government is not a lot different. It doesn’t take a lot of resources to satisfy a dog. Let citizens hear kind words and constantly feed their self esteem. It costs nothing to do that and the benefit is, citizens will indefinitely believe their representatives are working tirelessly on their behalf.

As soon as suffering among citizens starts, there will be all kinds of protests, displays of dissatisfaction and even violence. Notice that even today, loud noises are coming from a few who claim to be mistreated. Imagine what it will be like when the economy collapses.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.