When Roosevelt Died

presidential-funerals-franklin-d-rooseveltWhen did the Great Depression end? Often Roosevelt is given credit for ending the Great Depression. Anyone who reads knows that he was responsible for the depth of the Depression. During the 40s the economy temporarily converted to a command economy. Business investment in the private economy began immediately when Roosevelt died. Despite all of the lofty theories that were abound, the success of the economy depended on things no one in government could see. No one was willing to invest in plant and capital equipment when there was an administration bent on destroying the free market system.

The second Great Depression actually started in 2007. Suffering at the top has been minimal so far due to Quantitative Easing or more precisely the Fed’s political agenda. Why are corporations not investing in plant and equipment today? Corporate leaders know the folly of government economic policy. They are happy to accept the gratuities that go along with quantitative easing. Insiders get paid big time when the price of their stock gets run up. In other words, pigs won’t back away as long as the farmer keeps throwing slop into the trough. They are smart enough however, not to invest in the future while quantitative easing is destroying the economy.

The severity of this depression has not yet been experienced but it is coming. When will this depression end. It will start to end when the Federal Reserve dies. So, it may not actually end.00_logo_1

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.