Who Needs The Federal Reserve?

Time-7The Federal Reserve was established in 1914 ostensibly to for the good of the nation. Since 1914, the Federal Reserve has not made one accurate forecast. On every occasion when the Federal Reserve has initiated a program to help the economy, it has had the opposite effect.

Suppose a plane was designed and each test flight resulted in a crash. Who would want to ride in that plane? Not a soul would volunteer. Americans suffer issues with ignorance, character and general awareness.  Members of the Federal Reserve are routinely treated with great reverence and very few people would dream of eliminating the institution. Federal Reserve policy caused the last disaster in 2008 and there is another one in the offing. Suffering will follow.

Who needs the Fed? Everyone who feels comforted by the fantasy of being protected from harm by a public institution.

Despite never having a successful initiative in over 100 years even the world’s most esteemed economists are completely impressed with what the Fed does and hang on every word that comes out the mouth of the chairman.

The way economics is taught, this is no surprise. In mainstream economics, people make individual choices and work is treated as a first choice. In the real world, people do not function as individuals. They belong to aggregations and the herd makes decisions collectively. Mainstream economists treat work as a first choice. Individuals are seen as chomping at the bit to get a job and be productive. Nothing could be further from the truth. In the real world, work is a second choice. An individual will only work once it is clear that there is no way to live off the efforts of others. Thinking is work so thinking is avoided if someone else will think for a person.  Human beings are defined as freedom seekers. They have that potential but freedom is the only asset one is born with. Freedom is constantly bargained off in exchange for comfort.  Economists, with the exception of a few of us cannot possibly be right because the entire discipline as it is taught is based of false assumptions.

Sweet Suzie’s Kool-Aid is one great Curbside Jimmy tune.

Sweet Suzie’s Kool-Aid

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.