Fiat Money and Dr. Ben Carson

ben-carson

Physicians frequently believe their brilliance transfers to other disciplines. It doesn’t

Dr. Ben Carson has a check list of conservative positions he takes. All are the conventional wisdom of Republicans who unwittingly describe themselves as conservative. The fair tax is on the list. So is gun ownership and gun ownership prevents crime. Now Dr. Ben’s dialog is focused on  fiat money and and how harmful it is. This is common among the elite who have no idea what money really is.

Here is the truth about fiat money. Fiat money is actually backed by gold, more so than money that can be redeemed in gold. With a metal backed currency such as is the gold standard the free market for gold is replaced with a fixed value that is determined by government. Tampering with metal backed money supplies has been just as damaging as tampering with fiat money. Fiat money can be converted into gold or anything else. Fiat money is easier to abuse through the use of government. Fiat money would actually be a better system if the amount in circulation was not determined by the political process. Given our current political arena, the gold standard would be tampered with immediately and relentlessly the same as with fiat money.

Here is the true deal with respect to all money. Money evolves naturally in a society. Historically, gold has worked well as a naturally occurring currency up until government starts managing the amount in circulation.   The only money that has any real value is that which is derived from work. The amount accumulated as the result of work can logically be augmented by credit, up to an amount that can logically be repaid. The value of credit based money is based on future work providing a future income. To date, the world has not had a sound currency except over a few short time spans. Politics destroys currencies. Sound money has always been a work in progress. It still is.

How much money should be in circulation. Money representing value received for work + Credit representing future income from work performed.  Work is used in a broad sense so as to include corporate profits and future profits that can be logically expected.

Don’t expect an improvement in our currency unless its amount and value is determined by a free market system. The problem of having sound currency has been around since the beginning of civilization.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.