How a Republican President Spends

Download PDF Version

00After convincing the country that he was a conservative icon, Ronald Reagan embraced central economic planing and set all records for government spending. That seemed o.k. since he was widely perceived as the most conservative president in history.  Republicans do not mind astronomical government spending as long as it is part of a central planning initiative and the idea is presented by a Republican.

Donald Trump is signaling that he is going to do exactly what Reagan did. Economists call it supply side economics. Detractors call it trickle down economics. Smart people call it transferring income from the masses to the super rich. That is the result of all central planning.

So, how does this conservative spending take place? What is really accomplished by lowering taxes? A tax decrease while spending is increased causes the public to lose any awareness of what government costs. More spending is always deemed as just fine since out of pocket costs go down. The official justification is that the Keynesian spending plan will increase tax receipts more than paying for the increase in spending.  Democrats have learned to copy this Republican technique because the public becomes duped almost automatically.  After several years, the public forgets spending was ever increased.

There is no chance at all that a tax decrease will be good for the country. Like all Keynesian techniques, the supply side theory is flawed. Keynes invented the concept of a straw man. In Keynes’s mind a straw man was needed so as to be completely objective in implementing the plan. As it turns out the straw man doesn’t exist in nature. No such being exists and it is not possible for a straw man to exist. If there was a straw man, he would not be given the job. Government makes political decisions, not economic decisions. Self interest, is all that drives political decisions so the spending occurs in ways that enrich the politically powerful. The new spending increasingly mis-allocates resources because it occurs outside of the free market. Over time more harm than good occurs.

When Keynes died, he was already backing away from his theory. Economists usually believe that one number causes another and have no understanding of incentives.  Keynes made that mistake. Numbers don’t cause anything independently of the changing incentives that cause the numbers.

Unless Trump is reined in aggressively, he will become history’s biggest spending president. A supply side central planning program will perpetuate the rigged system he has promised to eliminate. What is central planning other than a technique of rigging the system?Euphemism
The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

 

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.